Only after they could find that they could not agree on how to interpret and apply the terms of the agreement – Russell Alexander Judge Gale found that the MOS awarded an agreed settlement amount and a calculation of the amount of payments and interest, including a first payment for the partial repayment of the transaction amount , which “would not be refundable in any event, but on any amount of the future transaction or on a judgment that is struck in the plaintiffs` court, is credited.” The MOS also stated that the parties “will, to the best of their ability, implement and conclude a formal settlement agreement that would confirm the payment schedule to be respected by the defendants, reciprocal releases and other conditions that must be agreed upon by and between the contracting parties.” The MOS also stated that “without the above, in the event that the parties are unable to accept the terms of a final transaction, so it is necessary to continue the litigation of the action, the defendants accept and acknowledge that the applicant is still entitled to take over the deposit of certain persons.” In some cases, confidential accounts are requested upon discovery. Federal courts may issue protection orders that prevent release, but the party seeking to prevent disclosure must demonstrate that disclosure would result in harm or prejudice.  However, in some states such as California, the onus is on the party seeking to release the confidential transaction.  I know that one of my colleagues often has an agreement to declassify forms in the form of being included in a broader settlement agreement rather than in the typical one-page contract that was signed during mediation, but after a long day of mediation, arguing over the details of the “intangible” provisions may not be what someone has in mind. If you do not wish to enter into a more detailed transaction agreement during mediation, you and your client should be satisfied that the short agreement signed during mediation is applicable, that it has all the conditions desired and protects your client`s interests. If you leave too much to be decided later in a more formal agreement, you may find that the transaction contract you thought was resolved in their case did not really do so. To me, the most interesting part of Justice Gales` order to Howard was not the conclusion – because, as stated below, the parties did not agree on all the essential conditions, and so he refused to apply the settlement agreement – but a citation to N.C.